Case study
Reading the Microdosing Survey
From a Scientific Reports PDF to a published course.
The source is Anderson and colleagues, 2021: a survey of adults who microdose psychedelics and a comparison group. The course walks through who was studied, what participants reported, and where a self-selected survey cannot support a stronger claim.
- Audience
- Clinicians reading the study
- Length
- About 30 minutes
- Shape
- Course with an outline
- Grounding
- Every block cited
What was decided
These are the answers given in the recording, and what the academy then held.
Step 1
Who it is for
Clinicians and researchers reading the study. Teach the findings and the limits. Beginner, academic tone, a quiz, English.
Step 2
How it should feel
A standard course with an outline. Balanced activity, some prior knowledge, editorial style. No design system was uploaded.
Step 3
The outline
Two modules: what the survey found, and where the evidence stops. Six lessons, including a closing check.
Step 4
The checks
Every lesson block cites the paper. Nine questions passed the support check. No grounding flags.
Step 5
Published
Free, Gravity theme, about 30 minutes. Heading-level warnings were shown and acknowledged before publish.
Each screen, in order
Arrows at the top move through the Studio screens. The note sits above the image, and the image fills the width. Open it for full size.
1 / 12












The interview, the outline and generation
Sign in, upload the PDF, answer every question, approve the outline, and wait while the lessons are written from the cited pages.
Apply, publish and open the course
The author applies the course, reads the checks, acknowledges the heading warnings and publishes. The recording then opens the course as a learner.